“State Citizen”

Author:

Category:

spot_img
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Sovereign citizens use the term “State Citizen” to express a central belief in their ideology: they consider themselves answerable only to the laws of their state (or sometimes a specific interpretation of those laws) and not subject to federal authority.

Here’s a breakdown of their reasoning:

  • Misunderstanding of Citizenship: Sovereign citizens believe there are two classes of citizens in the U.S.: state citizens and federal citizens [1, 2]. They see “State Citizen” status as superior and exempt from federal laws and regulations. This contradicts the reality of U.S. citizenship.
  • Rejection of Federal Authority: By emphasizing “State Citizen,” they aim to delegitimize the federal government’s power over them [2]. They might argue that only state laws apply to them, not federal ones.
  • Fabricated Legal Distinction: The concept of “State Citizen” has no basis in law. The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees a single U.S. citizenship that applies nationwide [3].
  • Challenge to National Identity: Sovereign citizens who use “State Citizen” might be implicitly rejecting the idea of a unified American identity in favor of a stronger state-based identity [4].

Why “State Citizen” Doesn’t Hold Up:

  • The U.S. Constitution establishes a federal system, but everyone residing in the country is still a U.S. citizen with obligations to both federal and state laws.

Important Points to Remember:

  • “State Citizen” is not a recognized legal status.
  • U.S. citizenship applies nationwide, and federal laws apply to all citizens.
  • Sovereign citizens’ arguments based on this distinction are invalid in court.

Citations:

Read More

Related Articles