“Conveyance” (rather than vehicle)

Author:

Category:

spot_img

Sovereign citizens use the term “conveyance” instead of “vehicle” to try and circumvent traffic laws and registration requirements. Here’s how:

  • Semantic Distancing: By using a different word, they create a semantic distance from the legal definition of a “vehicle” subject to regulations [1,]. It’s a wordplay tactic, not a legal distinction.
  • False Contract Theory: Some sovereign citizens believe using “conveyance” implies they’re not operating under a government-issued driver’s license or vehicle registration, but a private contract outside the legal system [2]. This theory has no legal validity.
  • Challenging Authority: By using “conveyance,” they might attempt to challenge an officer’s authority during a traffic stop, arguing they’re not “driving” a vehicle requiring a license [3]. Courts reject such arguments, focusing on the actual function of the machine.

Why it doesn’t hold up:

  • Legal Definition: In reality, “conveyance” has a well-established legal meaning encompassing any means of transportation, including vehicles.
  • Misunderstanding Authority: Traffic laws apply to all modes of transportation, regardless of the term used.
  • Courts See Through It: Courts are familiar with sovereign citizen tactics and don’t differentiate between “vehicle” and “conveyance” in the context of traffic laws.

In essence:

  • Sovereign citizens use “conveyance” to create a false distinction and challenge legitimate government authority.
  • It’s a wordplay tactic, not a legally meaningful difference.
  • Traffic laws apply to all conveyances, including those sovereign citizens call “conveyances.”

Citations:

Read More

Related Articles